Can you show exactly which decision was made, by whom, on which date and based on which information?
Not demonstrable if this is spread across mailboxes, chats, loose minutes or verbal alignment.
If tomorrow you are asked: “Show exactly how this decision was made” can you deliver that immediately? Not as a story. But as conclusive evidence — including substantiation, considerations and responsibilities.
Answer each question as if tomorrow an auditor, lawyer or regulator requests evidence. “Probably”, “somewhere in email”, “we can look it up” and “that colleague knows” count in this test as not demonstrable.
Choose per question: directly demonstrable or not demonstrable / doubt
Can you show exactly which decision was made, by whom, on which date and based on which information?
Not demonstrable if this is spread across mailboxes, chats, loose minutes or verbal alignment.
Can you immediately show the full substantiation of that decision, including source documents, versions and relevant correspondence?
Not demonstrable if documents must be manually collected or context must be reconstructed afterwards.
Can you demonstrate which risk considerations were made, which alternatives were discussed and why the chosen path was followed?
Not demonstrable if this was only implicit, existed in people’s heads or was never explicitly recorded.
Can you reconstruct which document version was leading at which moment and who made changes?
Not demonstrable if multiple versions circulate, files are stored locally or version control is not conclusive.
Can an external party understand this dossier within 48 hours without verbal explanation from your team?
Not demonstrable if the dossier depends on internal knowledge, context or personal explanation.
Can you prove that evidence is complete, unchanged and immediately retrievable when pressure increases?
Not demonstrable if you depend on manual searching, loose exports or trust in individuals.